3 active challenges meaning attacks, however in the last season it was basically a 'if they already have 3 challenges, cut them a break' sort of thing.

Perhaps 3 active challenges and no more than 5 total battles at once? Meaning, if you attack 3 tracks at once, you can have 2 active defences; similarly, 4 active defences means you can only have one active attack. That would mean that a clan nearing monopoly would have a lot less on their plate.

Speed's idea may be implemented in the next war, but I'm unsure how I will put it into the scoring.

Oh, and by the way - none of the 'big' clans have really faced off yet, which is why Unity is dominating right now. Once there are a few more matches played between the top clans (RB, un, TGS, SD, KT, MT if they join in again, etc) then we might see a bit more reshuffling.

Not saying that I don't have (slightly biased) faith in Unity though =P

****, ****, ****, ****, ****, ****. All these stupid loopholes and **** that have cropped up recently because I redid the rules after the old thread was deleted and then again with the new seasons.

4v4 + Disconnect => Restart the GP
Same thing again => Find a sub for the player in question
Excessive sandbagging => Disqualification of that player
When the sandbagger and the d/cer are the same person => We have a problem.

I'm just ****ing sick of TGS vs Unity wars, because one clan or the other will always end up breaking at least one rule and since I'm in Unity I cannot do anything about it on the basis that I'm in Unity myself. I do not want to do what I did with the BCWii war last season. I don't want to give it to TGS because they not only fielded a player who had connection troubles in a 4v4 but also got him to sandbag, giving them the item advantage and also taking YK's 6 points off Unity, and by the same token I can't give Unity the track because a) they lost, b) I'm in Unity myself and c) apparently Unity had only 4 players themselves.

I will give TGS the track, but I'm compelled to just take the easy method and kick both clans from the competition. Since I'm not interested in kicking the top two clans on the CTW ladder, I will simply drop all of their challenges vs each other and completely ban competition between the two clans.

The rules are there for a reason. Don't ****ing try to find loopholes or I *will* boot you from the competition. Half the rules are just unwritten common sense, really.

I also have no idea what I'm going to do regarding the d/c rule because obviously the dropping of the player is also inadequate.

Please, oh please don't let me say my side of the story. I do not want anymore drama to occur. *Sigh* Guess no more wars with Unity for a month or 2.

Don't be a **** about it. It's hard enough managing the CTW when I'm part of the #1 clan on the ladder. I know for a fact that most of what Crrrrrr and the rest of Unity are saying is true based on past experience.

If you're wanting to say your piece, ****ing do so, don't start being a sarcastic douche about it.

Hes giving you the track so I wouldn't complain about us not taking a loss. Obviously this just means that if we want each others tracks we'll have to wait till another clan takes them before we can get them. At this point in time I think that Unity and The Greatest Superlatives not waring each other is the most sensible solution that we've came up with.

So now you can't have a mature conversation without swearing. Hmm...

1. You guys lost with Ventrillo. I don't see what the difference is when I saw you guys in sandbag last GP and use lightnings and crap. I will admit you guys did not sandbag first or second GP. Anyway, TGS doesn't use Ventrillo.

2. It is not my fault that a d/c occurred and we restarted, so do not come to attack me. We set the rules at that point and we were fine with them.

3. Why bring up past experiences? The past is over.

4. Please do not assume Wolfy purposely d/c and barge in MY chat saying so. Since I am leader it is my responsibility. I can't say if he did or he didn't, but I trust my member because he said he didn't.

5. Yesterday, we did a friendly anyway and you guys sandbagged like crazy. Just saying I know it was a friendly but don't be hypocritical.

I understand that, but he is making TGS look bad. No need for that. I thought the matter was over. Can we just keep it that way.

Hmm... I edited my posts. They were a little harsh. I just do not want to be violated with swears so I apologize. I also unbanned you.

I am so staying out of this, because if I didn't, bad things would happen...